In this morning's Washington Post op-ed writer Bjorn Lomborg from Copenhagen argues that while cutting coal emissions is necessary it could hurt the most vulnerable in our world causing more harm than good. While I don't necessarily agree, I do think that it is worth considering and researching. Since I am in the middle of a research project on public housing and have seen the disaster that resulted in the name of progress, I am particularly attuned to the argument. The proposed taxing policy of France or the limits on emissions elsewhere according to the article could have devastating effects on the poor. It would seem that all of the effects--environmental, economic, and social--must be laid out for the public. I do fear that those who oppose the green plan will use this as an arrow in their quiver but we just have to take that risk to know the human impact. Take a look at this article--it will make you think, might make you mad, but will give you the other side of the story nonetheless.
Conversely leaders of small islands said to the United Nations, do something now or we are in danger of losing our homes and maybe our identities if global warming is not curtailed. So you see, there are two sides to consider here.
Very nice article...thanks for sharing it...it opened my eyes...i wasn't get mad at all..thanks for sharing it.
Posted by: Nursing top | July 14, 2010 at 02:03 AM
Nuclear is also very green even though it is very controversial.
Posted by: stock ideas | November 27, 2010 at 01:42 PM
Jesus forgives sinners, not criminals.Forgiveness affects your body and your mind, expert says
Posted by: Mens Nike Shox Sal | January 20, 2011 at 08:58 PM
Your third resource is confidence: repeat the process and stack the feeling of confidence on to happiness and strength
Posted by: Chanel Handbags | January 26, 2011 at 09:09 PM
your entries as less reputable, and thus less important to visitors looking for that information.
Posted by: Visvim | May 02, 2011 at 01:00 AM
I am particularly attuned to the argument. The proposed taxing policy of France or the limits on emissions elsewhere according to the article could have devastating effects on the poor. It would seem that all of the effects--environmental, economic, and social--must be laid out for the public.
Posted by: juicy couture outlet | August 12, 2011 at 05:24 AM
The article is worth reading, I like it very much
Posted by: Kate | December 22, 2011 at 10:06 AM